Schools already know their students deeply, until a teacher leaves, a year turns, or September resets the picture. Evalent Intelligence keeps that understanding alive across years.
90 second video
What is Evalent Intelligence?
People create the intelligence. Evalent organises a careful record and synthesises a clear, trustworthy current picture, so the right people can make informed decisions, from classroom to board. Staff decide. Understanding deepens instead of resetting every September.
Transitions without amnesia
Schools already hold deep intelligence about students, in classrooms, conversations, assessments, specialist notes, family context, and student reflection. Then it fragments. Invisible to the next adult who needs it. Paid for again every September.
Classroom judgement does not outlast the person who held it. The next adult cannot see what the school already knew.
From school leaders
“A child should not have to be known all over again every time a teacher changes.”
How the record forms
Documents, notes, student voice, and authorised family context become dated observations, matched to the right person. Nothing is guessed into permanence.
Gather
Notes, voice, specialist files, family context, fragmented until the school holds them as memory.
One student, year by year
On arrival there is almost nothing on file. What staff write now is what the next teacher can actually use.
Illustrative demo · ephemeral audio, not evidence
Class lens
The class lens turns the same student evidence into one reading of the room: headline, priorities, evidence, teaching moves, and who to notice.
Class · Homeroom
A class with real academic strengths in Humanities and Arts sitting alongside a consistent independence and confidence gap that cuts across several students and subjects.
The class
What the evidence shows
A small class of seven with a mean of 5.2 / 7. Humanities and Arts are genuine strengths. Mathematics and Physical & Health Education sit lower, and independence / confidence runs as a class-wide pattern across several subjects.
Teaching
What the patterns suggest is worth attention
Build independence into investigations
Several students need practice starting without every step scaffolded, especially in Mathematics.
Let Elena Hassan show her best work on purpose
High-quality output sits next to lower grades, give a structured chance for that strength to count.
Protect Individuals & Societies as a class strength
Mean 6.2, keep the stretch and the talk-rich habits that are working here.
Watch the Math and P&HE concern cluster
Low grades concentrate there, treat it as a provision pattern, not one-off incidents.
By subject
Individuals
Students the data flags
What the evidence shows
Stronger in Humanities than Mathematics; voice coverage still thin.
Worth considering
Get a recorded voice in, partner talk first before whole-class ask.
What the evidence shows
High-quality output alongside lower reported grades in places.
Worth considering
Give a structured chance for that strength to show, do not let the grade tell the whole story.
What the evidence shows
No recent recorded voice; independence flagged across investigations.
Worth considering
Invite a check-in. Look for barriers before assuming disengagement.
What the evidence shows
Carrying concern grades; confidence gap shows in Math and P&HE.
Worth considering
Reduce cold-call pressure; build short wins into practical tasks.
Section lens · Secondary
The section lens lifts class evidence into a secondary-school read: performance, institutional health, and where to invest, review, or protect.
What leadership needs to know
Grades 9–10 do not have enough learning support capacity. That is the main bottleneck for the secondary school.
Strategic priorities
Increase learning support for Grades 9–10
Learning support · this also goes up to the Head and the Board
Check Mathematics concern concentration across year groups
Subject risk held above any single classroom
Protect Humanities and Arts strength in the mid years
Keep what is already working while capacity is rebuilt
Performance
How the secondary school is performing
Section mean sits at 5.1. Attainment holds in Humanities and Arts; Mathematics and learning-support demand concentrate in Grades 9–10. Fourteen percent of students carry a concern grade.
Institutional health
What is working, and what is failing
Working, protect this
Failing, leadership risk
Recommendation
What leadership should prioritise
Who needs to see what
Same notes and assessments. Different screens for different jobs: from one student, to a class, to the year group, up to the Head, Board, and Finance.
Student profile
Year 10 · Teacher · Pastoral · SENCO · Leadership
Maya’s Journey
“I want to lead discussion without feeling on show.”
What matters most right now
No slideshow of a named student. You can listen, share the link, or print a handover.
Class · Homeroom
Homeroom · Ms Okonkwo · 2025–26
What matters most for this class
What the notes show
What to try in teaching
Students to notice
Year group · Head of Year
Cohort briefing · Students / Teachers / Strategy
What matters most for the year
Section · Principal
Where to put money, what to check, what to protect
What the principal needs to know
Priorities for the section
Executive · Head of School
Whole-school picture · follow up with section principals
Head priority
School-wide patterns only. No named students. This is not a prediction about who will leave.
Governance · Board
Questions for the Head, not running the school day to day
Board priority
Subject concern
| Subject | Mean | Concern | % |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mathematics | 4.2 | 14 of 40 | 35% |
Governance · Finance committee
School priorities turned into budget questions, not guesses about who will leave
Needs a budget conversation
This is the committee agenda. It is not a forecast of who will leave the school.
Everyone in the story
Voice and reflection connect to adult consideration, not a black hole. The story continues when the adults change.
Run Evalent Intelligence with full access. Share what you learn. We turn it into a case study that shows how your school kept student understanding alive across years.
Pricing
Choose the plan that fits your school, every tier includes full Evalent Intelligence.
$4,950/yr
$395 first year
US$4,555 less than Essentials in year one. Then standard renewal.
For schools ready to run a guided Intelligence cycle and share materials for a published case study.
Unlimited access · year one
$4,950 /yr
Billed annually · USD · 400 documents
Single campus · growing recordFor a school building longitudinal memory with a clear owner and one main campus.
Core Intelligence
$9,450 /yr
Billed annually · USD · 800 documents
Mid-size · multi-sectionBest fit for international schools running Intelligence across sections with richer evidence volume.
Expanded Intelligence
$14,950 /yr
Billed annually · USD · 1,800 documents
Larger & multi-campusFor larger schools and groups that need coordinated rollout and higher volume capacity.
Group / multi-campus
Custom quote · volume discounts available.
Subject to terms and conditions
Optional · separate product
Core Intelligence is longitudinal memory and role-right briefings. Owned school-improvement Actions live in Evalent Transform (off by default, never required to use Intelligence).
Questions schools ask
Dashboards usually show a slice of now. Intelligence is longitudinal memory: evidence accumulates, stays attributable, and is re-read at the right altitude as the school’s story continues.
Students contribute through voice and reflection; teachers contribute classroom evidence; middle leaders, principals, Heads, Board, and Finance each have role-appropriate views. It is a whole-community evidence loop.
Sophistication grows because your authorised evidence and human responses grow. Model assistance remains bounded; people stay accountable. We do not claim autonomous self-improving AI.
Never. Evalent structures evidence and recommendations. School professionals decide.
No. Owned school-improvement Actions are Evalent Transform, a separate optional product, off by default.
No. It sits above systems of record as a derived intelligence layer.
Essentials $4,950 / yr (400 documents), Professional $9,450 / yr (800), Enterprise $14,950 / yr (1,800), plus a US$395 case-study path for year one. Subscribe from Pricing, request an invoice, or join the case study program.
A proposed path for schools that want full Intelligence access while helping Evalent tell a truthful story. In return for running a cycle and sharing materials with permission to publish, the first year is offered at US$395 on this page, then standard renewal. See the case study module.
You can join the case study or subscribe from Pricing on this page. If you would rather talk first, email hello@evalent.io.
Get started
People create the intelligence. Evalent organises it. Staff decide. Join the case study or subscribe, then feed the record from what your school already holds.
