The journey

Kindergarten to Grade 12.One record that never forgets.

A child can spend thirteen years in your school. The record joins them whenever they arrive, follows them through every class, every teacher and every transition, and is still there at the moments where evidence directly shapes a life outcome.

Day one

The record begins with what you already hold

No integration project, no data entry campaign. Your school drops in the documents it already produces: grade exports, report card comments, specialist reports, observation forms, survey results. Evalent reads them, extracts dated observations into the six lenses, matches each one to the right student with human review of anything uncertain, and the record is alive within weeks.

Every September

The handover that finally holds

Every year, every child changes hands, and what their last teacher learned traditionally evaporates over the summer. Instead, every incoming teacher receives a handover brief compiled from the record: who the child is, what to know before teaching them, and a working baseline against which the new year will be read. The highest-stakes instance is the entry to the final examination years, but it happens for every year group, every year.

Every term, every age

Early warning, while there is still time

Each child's performance is read against their own baseline from the record, not against the class average. Deviation is flagged with its likely explanation attached, whether that child is seven or seventeen, while intervention still changes the outcome. Most crises were visible terms before they were named. Now someone is looking.

Every week, both years

Briefings and actions, at every altitude

Teachers open a class briefing before the lesson: the record's current read on every student in the room. Heads of year see the same evidence rolled up to their altitude; leadership sees the section. And when something needs doing, it becomes an action with one owner, a metric with a baseline and a target, a review date, and escalation if it stalls. Insight stops evaporating in meetings.

The transitions

Where records used to go to die

Early years into primary. Primary into secondary. Secondary into the final examination years. Every boundary is where context has always been lost: the specialist report filed three buildings ago, the pattern a Year 4 teacher spotted that nobody told Year 7 about. The record crosses every one of these boundaries intact, because it belongs to the child, not to the phase.

The senior years

Predicted grades set against evidence

Predictions determine university access, and they are traditionally set from recent marks and memory. Here, each teacher sees the student's full longitudinal profile, years deep by this point, alongside their proposed prediction before confirming it, and leadership sees where proposals diverge from what the evidence suggests, before submission, not after.

Reference season

References written from a rich brief

Coordinators and subject teachers writing university references receive a structured evidence brief per student: years of observation highlights, trajectory, and the student's own voice, organised around what a strong reference needs to say. The human writes. The blank page is gone.

Results day

The loop closes

When results arrive, the record checks itself: which early signals predicted outcomes, which predictions held, which departments run hot or cold. Every answer sharpens how the next cohort's evidence is read. This is the moment the record starts compounding.

Try it · Prediction calibration

Which of your departments predicts accurately?

Most schools genuinely cannot answer this, and students pay for it in missed and inflated university offers. Step through three cohort cycles of an illustrative school and watch what measurement alone does to calibration.

Predicted vs actual mean grade, by department

MathematicsOver-predicts by 0.2
SciencesOver-predicts by 0.7
English ACalibrated
HumanitiesUnder-predicts by 0.5
Actual result Predicted grade

First results cycle. Sciences over-predicts by 0.7 of a grade: students carried conditional offers they could not meet. Humanities under-predicts by 0.5: students aimed lower than they should have. Nobody knew, because nobody was measuring.

The moat is not the software.

It is the validated record that accumulates inside it. Cohort after cohort, your school builds a dataset connecting early evidence to real outcomes in your own context, and a child who joins your kindergarten graduates with a record thirteen years deep. Nobody can hand you that, and nobody can take it away. It can only be built, year by year, by starting.